Panic Alarms

[Badge714]

Thanks everyone for your good advice. It looks like they are going to stay with the hard wired system from their current alarm company.

[Bill Warnock]

Integrator, I liked the latching mode duress devices and an alarm panel indicator that stayed until the responding officers notified communications of the site was secure and the senior person he or she alone reset the device and the panel indicator was then extinguished. That is positive control. As long as the indicator was illuminated, you knew the patrol was still on-scene.
With the older installations, evertime you had a thunderstorm the panel lighted like a Christmas Tree. Likewise when a heavy piece of machinery started-up you tended to get false alarms.
On one occasion in the township a bank teller tripped the device and the snapping sound was heard by all and all the tellers and two customers were murdered. The three robbers were subsequently caught and confessed they were spooked, panicked and opened fire. Common Pleas Court found them guilty of aggravated murder and executed.
It goes without saying, duress devices should always be silent in their operation.
Enjoy the day,
Bill

[Bill Warnock]

You didn't have to edit and add that last line CameraMan. Some of the posts that make me smile or chuckle the most are like yours. I'm not old enough to have installed the dino stuff, but I'm not young enough to have avoided working on it.

Integrator, you would have indeed enjoyed that era; happily for the most part, it is in the physical security dust bin.
Enjoy the day,
Bill

[integrator97]

When dinosaurs roamed the earth?

My dad used to tell me stories of single-zone panels he installed when he was my age. Makes me glad I was born when I was. Single zone panels, foil, and burning your own chips? Wow.

Oh, and I agree that wireless is prone to failure and only good for short range use.

You didn't have to edit and add that last line CameraMan. Some of the posts that make me smile or chuckle the most are like yours. I'm not old enough to have installed the dino stuff, but I'm not young enough to have avoided working on it.

[CameraMan]

Way back when alarm panels had a limited number of zones, or just a single alarm BA circuit, these were used to determine who set off the alarm. "I didn't push it. Well yours is tripped". Nowadays, with all the zones available, it just doesn't make sense. Put each on it's own zone. Some day it's going to cost a life, if it hasn't already.

When dinosaurs roamed the earth?

My dad used to tell me stories of single-zone panels he installed when he was my age. Makes me glad I was born when I was. Single zone panels, foil, and burning your own chips? Wow.

Oh, and I agree that wireless is prone to failure and only good for short range use.

[NRM_Oz]

On the radio units I purchased for my security team during the Y2K BS, we had trunk call radios with mercury switches and there was a duress (panic) button about 1 inch long for activating a piezo siren which could be set to run for 1 minute to continuous at 120db which is bloody annoying.

1 pharmacy client had me examine their early morning security and we agreed that a panic alarm was mandatory and for now I installed those personal 9 volt units with a manual button or key chain. Day 1, the sales manager was opening up when a known methadone user came in right behind and began to lose it. She pulled the pin and it screamed sending him to leave the building as she locked the door. Eventually a wired system was installed with portable duress units on fobs (break off necklaces) that were effective but then again there is nothing like having 2 people around is there ?

[integrator97]

Please do yourself a favor and use a wired panic button such as an Ademco 269 (link below). That way you have no worries about when the battery was changed, interference etc. I will never spec a wireless solution unless someone needs to wear a panic device and even then I spec with many caveats!!

http://www.security.honeywell.com/hs.../ho/21638.html

John

I prefer a panic button that is momentary, not a latching as this one is. Something like the HUB-2SA on this page: http://www.unitedsecurity.com/pages/holdup.html. I cannot count the number of times I have done service and found the latching panic button tripped, even in banks. The problem is that these are almost always silent, and don't show on the keypad, so there is no reminder to reset them.

Way back when alarm panels had a limited number of zones, or just a single alarm BA circuit, these were used to determine who set off the alarm. "I didn't push it. Well yours is tripped". Nowadays, with all the zones available, it just doesn't make sense. Put each on it's own zone. Some day it's going to cost a life, if it hasn't already.

[Bill Warnock]

Please do yourself a favor and use a wired panic button such as an Ademco 269 (link below). That way you have no worries about when the battery was changed, interference etc. I will never spec a wireless solution unless someone needs to wear a panic device and even then I spec with many caveats!!

http://www.security.honeywell.com/hs.../ho/21638.html

John

Excellent points John. I've been in buildings where officers could see each other but not communicate with each other. When judges wanted to carry wireless devices on their persons, we jumped through our hats. Leaky coaxial, helmets, floor repeaters and a lot of prayer went into those projects. John as you can well imagine what a Hertz antenna can do to a signal or unbonded or ungrounded metal fixtures confuse and befuddle security screening devices. We have found through much trial and error in the DOD arena what can happen when DC low voltage signal conductors are placed in the same tray with high voltage AC conductors. Worse yet is not encasing those low voltage conductors in hard walled ferrous metal conduit properly ground/bonded. When moving to the US Marshals Service, we tried to remember those awful lessons learned.
Enjoy the day,
Bill

[john_harrington]

Go Hardwired

Please do yourself a favor and use a wired panic button such as an Ademco 269 (link below). That way you have no worries about when the battery was changed, interference etc. I will never spec a wireless solution unless someone needs to wear a panic device and even then I spec with many caveats!!

http://www.security.honeywell.com/hs.../ho/21638.html

John

[gcmc security part 2]

They wont let you use a cell phone in a hospital anymore, claiming that it interferes with the equipment.

Actually most hospitals are getting away from that policy. When we got rid of our policy restricting cell phone use, we were told by the hospital lawyers that because so many hospital employees were issued cell phones for use how could we tell other people they were unsafe.

We did still restrict their use in ICU/NICU

[integrator97]

They wont let you use a cell phone in a hospital anymore, claiming that it interferes with the equipment.

Yea, and my $99 phone can also mess up the million dollar avionics on a plane too.

But I hope they never let people use their phones on planes. Can you imagine 50 people on phones in that small of a space?

Funny how they worry about our phones, but as Bill pointed out, the amount of rf and emf from the medical equipment is often huge.

[Curtis Baillie]

They wont let you use a cell phone in a hospital anymore, claiming that it interferes with the equipment.

[Rooney]

I completely agree with Curtis and Bill. A hospital environment is very condusive to wireless signal propagation and interference. I have heard many stories of wireless alarm devices not working properly in that environment. The repercussions of someone falsely thinking help is on the way during a life threatening situation could be catastrophic and open someone up to liable. As Bill said wired devices would be the way to go.

[Bill Warnock]

I did some work for a retail pharmacy chain who looked long and hard at panic alarms, but decided to forego them due to reliability and false alarm rates. This may be OK for a hospital setting, but I rarely recommend them for retail.

Curt, can you just imagine the interference problems presented by all the electronic equipment in a hospital environment. Hopefully your advice will not fall upon deaf ears. Here again sensitivity, criticality and vulnerability come front and center.
I believe 714 is better off in the installation of hard wired duress devices. It might sound trite, but they should think hard about ferrous metal piping and ensuring the runs are separated from high voltage transmission lines.
Enjoy the day,
Bill

[Curtis Baillie]

I did some work for a retail pharmacy chain who looked long and hard at panic alarms, but decided to forego them due to reliability and false alarm rates. This may be OK for a hospital setting, but I rarely recommend them for retail.