Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hillary Clinton

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Curtis Baillie
    replied
    HOLY CRAP!

    Leave a comment:


  • Chucky
    replied
    You never know what your vote will get these days.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Rooney
    replied
    Well written Chucky. From what I have read they have had an increase in violent crime in the UK as well. It just goes to show how much people on the gun issue need to research before their decision. As stated in the article, only law abiding citizens will turn them in. The crooks and scum won't.

    I'm not sure what I would do if they outlawed guns here in the U.S.. Sincle all of mine are registered. I would have a hard time believing that our society would not allow me the right to defend myself or someone else if confronted with a life-death situation.

    There are other ways to control firearms then just flat outlawing them. I liked the idea of biometrics incorporated into the firearm. Only the person that purchased it can use it. If you purchase one from a private person you go into a gun store and they can reprogram it to you. That would transfer ownership over as well. (I know I'll hear alot of slack here for that )

    Here is a link to a study done about gun control and the results.
    http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/admin/...Experiment.pdf
    Last edited by Rooney; 02-01-2007, 05:32 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chucky
    replied
    Follow up on my previous post. I thought Aussies were conservative mostly. Well someone forwarded this to me so I will share it with all. Most of us know this to be true anyway but what the hay.


    Here's a thought to warm some of your hearts...

    From: Ed Chenel, A police officer in Australia

    Hi Yanks,

    I thought you all would like to see the real figures from
    Down Under. It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia
    were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be
    destroyed by our own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than
    $500 million dollars.

    The first year results are now in:

    Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent,

    Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent ;

    Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!

    In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300
    percent.

    (Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the
    criminals did not and criminals still possess their guns!)

    While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in
    armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in
    the past12 months, since the criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is
    unarmed.

    There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of
    the elderly, while the resident is at home.

    Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has
    decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in
    "successfully ridding Australian society of guns." You won't see this
    on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the
    State Assembly disseminating this information.

    The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of
    honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws
    affect only the law-abiding citizens.

    Take note Americans, before it's too late!

    Leave a comment:


  • Chucky
    replied
    Why do folks think that Libs want to take away our guns? It seems that there has been a large misconception about this subject. My state has been run by Conservs that have done every thing they can to make it very hard for law abiding folks like myself to get an ltc. The conserves have been in power for the last 4 or more terms. Now thanks to The GW Bush monkey folks voted a Lib as governor.

    Now all the conserves are running around saying "Man you just watch he will have all our guns taken away" DOH! The conservs loved to state in the media how hard that they have made it to get a gun in this state. But they forget to add legal guns.

    I will guarantee that any one of you could go into the city and for $400.00 bucks purchase a pistol off the corner. And I mean a quality one that would make mine look like scrap metal or composite. The point I"m getting to is that no one wants to take your guns away just need to focus on the problem guns.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eric
    replied
    Originally posted by Rooney
    I know what you mean. But, you have to take into consideration that Canada is one of the most relaxed countries when it come to letting anybody in, including terrorists. I have a few friends up there that are thinking of moving down here just because of that. They said they thought the country was going down the tubes with all of the immigration. I guess we have alot in common after all.
    Some change is in the works, signs are beginning but take a while to break the multicultural thinking ingrained over the last few decades. Holland, UK and Austrailia have been changing in that regard already.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chucky
    replied
    Rice are you kidding me? She is so far up Bushes butt that he puts Preparation H
    on his ass in the morning and Rices feet are starting to shrink. Do you really think that she has ever once said no Mr President that won't work?
    Although she did hold her own on Meet The Press and I really think she has one to hold. (Thanks Groucho for that one)

    Leave a comment:


  • Rooney
    replied
    Originally posted by N. A. Corbier
    They're gonna go after the guns anyway, neo-libs ran the senate and house this term due to the backlash from Iraq. People are associating Bush with Republican, and Neo-Con with Republican, and voting democrat.

    From one polar opposite to another we go... And Hillary, if she wins, will usher in that polar opposite.
    As the saying goes, "From my cold dead hands".
    It's funny how the politicians don't take reality into their thought process. Look at Australia and England. Crime didn't go down after outlawing guns. It just made law abiding citizens easier targets. In the U.S. the states that have "right to carry" have seen a drop in crime. "Except for states that border Mexico" but, that's because of drug wars and people smugglers.

    The Democratic swing is due to Iraq. I'm only hoping the rest of the U.S. doesn't end up like California. They are introducing legislation now that will outlaw spanking. I'm not for child abuse but simple spanking IS NOT child abuse. Not including the anti-second ammendment people there. As the Dems always seem to be thinking, "Work hard so you can pay everyone else your money that doesn't want to work". When will people take responsibility for their own actions and not blame society for their problems?

    Leave a comment:


  • HotelSecurity
    replied
    Am I the only liberal on this forum? ( Left leaning at that )


    I like medicare, government run precription medicine insurance, no fault car insurance, Air Canada (before it was privitized), Petro Canada (same thing), CBC etc etc

    Leave a comment:


  • N. A. Corbier
    replied
    They're gonna go after the guns anyway, neo-libs ran the senate and house this term due to the backlash from Iraq. People are associating Bush with Republican, and Neo-Con with Republican, and voting democrat.

    From one polar opposite to another we go... And Hillary, if she wins, will usher in that polar opposite.

    Leave a comment:


  • EMTGuard
    replied
    I won't vote for Hillary since I know that one of the first things she will go after is my guns. I can tolerate alot but messing with my firearms isn't acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • copelandamuffy
    replied
    Is Rice going to run you think? In my opinion, all politicians lie... We as voters have to vote for whoever is less evil.

    It is just my humble opinion that Dr. Rice is considering.
    Many Republicans feel that the best ticket maybe a
    Rudy Giuliani and Condi Rice ticket in 2008.

    Hillary Clinton for President? I'd vote for a blind a** ape before I'd vote
    Madam Hillary.

    Leave a comment:


  • SecTrainer
    replied
    Originally posted by davis002
    This morning, she accounced that she is opening a presidential exploratory committee. I honestly believe she has a decent shot at winning the election if she does in fact decide to run.
    I know I won't be able to bring myself to vote for Billary.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rooney
    replied
    Originally posted by HotelSecurity
    The US is the big man on the block in world affairs & us Canadians don't get a vote but have to live with what you guys decide
    I know what you mean. But, you have to take into consideration that Canada is one of the most relaxed countries when it come to letting anybody in, including terrorists. I have a few friends up there that are thinking of moving down here just because of that. They said they thought the country was going down the tubes with all of the immigration. I guess we have alot in common after all.

    Leave a comment:


  • HotelSecurity
    replied
    The US is the big man on the block in world affairs & us Canadians don't get a vote but have to live with what you guys decide

    Leave a comment:

Leaderboard

Collapse
Working...
X