" The U.S. Supreme Court said on Tuesday it would decide whether handguns can be banned in the nation's capital, a case that could produce its first ruling in nearly 70 years on the right of Americans to bear arms.
The nation's highest court agreed to hear an appeal by officials from the District of Columbia government arguing that the city's 31-year-old law banning private possession of handguns should be upheld as constitutional."
Keep an eye on this one cause if it is determined once and for all that the 2nd amendment in fact only applies to "some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia." Then we may have to change our title from Security to Militia Security officers. If this goes in favor of the term Militia being an army then we all are in deep do do. When was the last time you heard a news caster say that the victim was killed by an illegally owned handgun. It's always that the victim was killed buy a handgun period.
The nation's highest court agreed to hear an appeal by officials from the District of Columbia government arguing that the city's 31-year-old law banning private possession of handguns should be upheld as constitutional."
Keep an eye on this one cause if it is determined once and for all that the 2nd amendment in fact only applies to "some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia." Then we may have to change our title from Security to Militia Security officers. If this goes in favor of the term Militia being an army then we all are in deep do do. When was the last time you heard a news caster say that the victim was killed by an illegally owned handgun. It's always that the victim was killed buy a handgun period.
Comment