After reading one of the other threads, this thought crossed my mind. I'd like
to throw one of my opinions out to see what all of you think. In my
experience, I find that most often the most effective supervisors are
the ones who have started from the bottom and worked their way upward.
On the other hand, the supervisors who landed their jobs because they were
only "highly educated", were hired because of their high position in an
unrelated field of work, or were hired because they are buddies with the
person in charge of hiring, are ineffective and sometimes harmful to the
organization. Y'all are now free to applaud me, throw rotten tomatoes at me,
or otherwise let me know what you think.
to throw one of my opinions out to see what all of you think. In my
experience, I find that most often the most effective supervisors are
the ones who have started from the bottom and worked their way upward.
On the other hand, the supervisors who landed their jobs because they were
only "highly educated", were hired because of their high position in an
unrelated field of work, or were hired because they are buddies with the
person in charge of hiring, are ineffective and sometimes harmful to the
organization. Y'all are now free to applaud me, throw rotten tomatoes at me,
or otherwise let me know what you think.
Comment