Tweet
If signed into law, all in house security will have to be licensed, just like contract. Since background checks are a part of the process, I bet some guards will be out of a job.
-
Last edited by Mr. Security; 03-24-2007, 06:11 PM.Security: Freedom from fear; danger; safe; a feeling of well-being. (Webster's)
-
This will also mean that in-house operations with constables will have a problem, since CT law prohibits a licensee from being appointed a special policeman or constable.Originally posted by Mr. SecuritySome Kind of Commando Leader
"Every time I see another crazy Florida post, I'm glad I don't work there." ~ Minneapolis Security on Florida Security Law -
California just did this and it turned out great. CA also mandated 40 hours training before you get your guard card.Originally posted by Mr. SecurityComment
-
CT has some interesting laws regarding security. Square badges, etc. On the flip side, they make any armored car guard a special state police officer through statute.Originally posted by publicsafetyredSome Kind of Commando Leader
"Every time I see another crazy Florida post, I'm glad I don't work there." ~ Minneapolis Security on Florida Security LawComment
-
Update
An article from the AP on this Website's home page stated that this bill has stalled. That's unfortunate, because it means that no criminal background check is required.Security: Freedom from fear; danger; safe; a feeling of well-being. (Webster's)Comment
-
I heard a while ago that it "wasnt" going to make it. I think it is a good idea but they are also talking about some "loop" holes for the larger companies that have internal security.Comment
-
The only good thing about it, IMO, is that they won't be required to wear those dorky looking, clunky square badges that we're stuck with in contract security.
Security: Freedom from fear; danger; safe; a feeling of well-being. (Webster's)Comment
Comment