As I posted recently, I am now working as a Campus Security Officer at a public college. We are "hands off". While I understood that when I accepted the position, I sometimes worry about the "what ifs".
Considering that there was just an incident in Kenosha WI that made the news, I sometimes worry about both extremes. For example, when there is a physical fight involving students, the "optics" of doing absolutely nothing look bad to me. So, in other words, to be present when students are actively, physically fighting and "observe and report" look bad, in my opinion.
On the other hand, if ANY hands on is prohibited, the risk is getting fired for violation of the policy.
I have told my partners, if anybody attacks them, I will just respond and they will simply have to fire me from my job.
Is anybody here actually trained on ANY sort of middle ground?
Considering that there was just an incident in Kenosha WI that made the news, I sometimes worry about both extremes. For example, when there is a physical fight involving students, the "optics" of doing absolutely nothing look bad to me. So, in other words, to be present when students are actively, physically fighting and "observe and report" look bad, in my opinion.
On the other hand, if ANY hands on is prohibited, the risk is getting fired for violation of the policy.
I have told my partners, if anybody attacks them, I will just respond and they will simply have to fire me from my job.
Is anybody here actually trained on ANY sort of middle ground?
Comment