Ok. This isn't ment to be a us vs them or who's better. The thing is that I found this page - http://64.225.215.3/weiser_v_inhouse.htm while websurfing one night. Reading it gave me conflicting feelings. As a contract SO I can se many postitives but also many negatives with the arguements Wieser uses to justify the use of contract SOs.
Right off the bat I see one that really pissed me off and let me know that this is probably a company I'd not want to work for.
Now the company I work for tends to put you on a drop and you almost NEVER work anywhere else until either you quit or they loose the contract. So we really become familiar with the facility and the employees. I see the problems with this sometimes when we become so intergrated into the company that some people don't realize that we are contract and don't answer to them. That's why I can sort of agree with statements like
but at the same time it's that famililiarity that ensures we know the different departments, their supervisors and when answering the switchboards we are able to forward the calls to the proper extensions.
Take a look at the page and lets have a friendly discussion on specific things you feel about the points made by that company.
Right off the bat I see one that really pissed me off and let me know that this is probably a company I'd not want to work for.
1. Right to remove any guard, any time, without cause.
3. In-House familiarity tends to inhibit guard performance.
Take a look at the page and lets have a friendly discussion on specific things you feel about the points made by that company.
Comment