Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

attacked, need opinions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    Guest
    Guest

  • Guest
    Guest replied
    true

    No joke, I don't have that option though. We aren't allowed to carry shotgun yet. We are steadily pushing for it. I would love to use that option. I can only dream for now.

    Leave a comment:

  • Curtis Baillie
    Senior Member

  • Curtis Baillie
    replied
    Originally posted by dougo83 View Post
    If you are commisioned to carry, I sure a heck would. My Colt .45 serves as quite the deterrent, even in the areas we work around MS-13 and other hard gangs. Also, non-com security guards can get OC spray fairly easily. In TX, it's a four-hour course to get the card and there is no limit on size in the occupational code. I carry three cans. Mk-2 for patrol with an MK-9 for backup. I keep a fire-extinguisher sized bottle in the cruiser just in case. Nothing clears a crowd of rowdy drunks like a hit from that bottle.
    I disagree - nothing clears a crowd like jacking a shell into the chamber of a Remington 870.

    Leave a comment:

  • Guest
    Guest

  • Guest
    Guest replied
    well..

    If you are commisioned to carry, I sure a heck would. My Colt .45 serves as quite the deterrent, even in the areas we work around MS-13 and other hard gangs. Also, non-com security guards can get OC spray fairly easily. In TX, it's a four-hour course to get the card and there is no limit on size in the occupational code. I carry three cans. Mk-2 for patrol with an MK-9 for backup. I keep a fire-extinguisher sized bottle in the cruiser just in case. Nothing clears a crowd of rowdy drunks like a hit from that bottle.

    Leave a comment:

  • N. A. Corbier
    Senior Member

  • N. A. Corbier
    replied
    Under what authority in RCW is a citizen detaining a suspect for law enforcement? Most people's "detention" is actually a citizen's arrest. When I looked through RCW, only thing i could find was Merchant's Right, and that's only for those who are shoplifting.

    Leave a comment:

  • Lawson
    Senior Member

  • Lawson
    replied
    Since when are Security Officers covered under the ASLT 3 code?

    The only Security I see covered there are those employed at a Transit Center or a School District

    Leave a comment:

  • Michael Ledgerwood
    Member

  • Michael Ledgerwood
    replied
    I would be hesitant on saying security or citizens in general may effect a citizens arrest. When I was in the police academy we went through the RCW and according to the definitions given the term "arrest" means an arrest by a sworn law enforcement officer. When I worked for the PD, we had several instances where citizens wanted to "arrest" someone. We would not let them, but we would obtain a sworn statement and then make the arrest based on that statement. The fact that there is an Attorney Generals' Opinion doesn't make a difference and won't help you if you are sued. You are required to abide by the RCW or the WAC. DOL, Attorney Generals office, or WSCJTC do not have authority to change that. With all that said that is not to say that security can't detain. I have detained several suspects in handcuffs as a SO and then turned them over to LEOs. Now keep in mind that even if it is legal to effect a citizens arrest, that doesn't mean you should do so. According to the RCW, as well as several prosecutors I have dealt with, an arrest is a whole different ball park than a detention. Once you say the word "Arrest" you have opened yourself up to legal liability. Like I said to avoid liability I would use the term "detained", theres a lot less implied knowledge with detentions.

    Now I have worked for two companies in the Seattle area (Risk Management and First Response). When I worked for Risk, we had a hud housing project on the Seattle Renton line that was gang infested. My advice to you is get to know the tenants. Your tenants will be your greatest potential ally or your worst enemy depending on your behavior towards them. I have saved myself from having to fight several times by using tact rather than aggresiveness. You need to be professional and fair and do your job. That doesn't mean go out and thrust your authority around. Remember you are Security not the police. Enforce what you must but do it fairly, you will earn respect. Keep in mind that assault on a security officer is a class C felony under the RCW ( it falls under Assault 3rd degree ). Next time gang members try and assault you (even if its shooting fireworks at you, which should be Assault 2nd btw) tell the PD that you will press charges. By the story you said, I am willing to bet you are working in King County and more than likely Seattle. I have had several instances with SPD where they failed to respond all together oh well thats what you get in a department that large. Now regarding carrying empty pouches, DON'T DO IT. Not only is it stupid and unprofessional but you give a false impression. For example someone might see you in uniform and tell you someone is being assaulted but you have empty pouches so now you cant defend yourself or detain anyone for your safety. Liability. Wear what you are trained for and allowed to carry by law and company / site policy. You do not need a bunch of fancy tools to be an effective SO. A radio or cell, flashlight, and maybe handcuffs should be your minimum (yes I do support armed S/Os, I am one after all). You can wear 10 guns and have a bazooka strapped to your back, won't get you any respect. Your respect will come from how you treat people. Remember word travels and if you let someone piss you off and yell at them then the word will get out that your rude and easy to piss off. A happy customer will tell 3 people about you, a pissed off customer will tell 10 people. Keep that in mind and you shouldn't have problems with attitudes. Your most usefull weapon is your brain and common sense. Use that and go home EVERY NIGHT. Remember you are a security officer therefore, despite what your company policy might say, you are NOT required to intervene in anything. If a situation is too hairy then retreat and wait for back up or LEOs. Nothing wrong with that (I have done that several times). After all you need to go home EVERY NIGHT (that bears repeating). Security is a thankless job. Several idiots have caused us to not only be a laughing stock but to have limited authority. Management never helps either. Go out there and do your best, obey the law and be safe. Get as much training as you can and befriend local LEOs in your area. You will go much further if you do that.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Charger
    replied
    I haven't seen that form before either. However, my WA instructor DID inform us that we could arrest on the breach of peace misdos, and explained the technicalities of it to us... Of course, that MAY have something to do with the fact that my WA instructor is also the company's owner, and takes a very proactive stance on how we perform our duties..

    EDIT: Actually, after looking through it more in-depthly, I realized I HAVE seen that study guide before... My armed instructor (different person) let us browse through a copy of it during our classroom session... So there ARE some instructors out there who follow it. Just FYI.
    Last edited by Charger; 07-05-2007, 12:07 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • LPGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by BHR Lawson View Post
    There is a Washington State Attorney General's Opinion that specifically denotes that citizens may complete a citizens arrest for not only the felony, but the misdemeanor given that it is a breach of the peace. It also allows for investigative detentions, something a lot states do not have.

    https://fortress.wa.gov/cjtc/www/for...tudy_Guide.pdf
    In addition, that guide is presented by the Washington State CJTC (Criminal Justice Training Commission) specifically for training armed private security and private investigators. As the guide's disclaimer says, while it is not to be considered legal advice, it has been reviewed by an attorney and is in alignment with current Washington State case law as of February 2005.

    Thanks for posting that, BHR Lawson. I've read it in the past but totally forgot about it. For more information on private security from the WA State CJTC, visit https://fortress.wa.gov/cjtc/www/pri...ity/index.html.

    Leave a comment:

  • Lawson
    Senior Member

  • Lawson
    replied
    I had been in security for 2 years with 3 different companies and had never seen that study guide until I came onto this forum. No S/O Ive talked to in WA has ever seen that either with any companies they are with.

    Leave a comment:

  • N. A. Corbier
    Senior Member

  • N. A. Corbier
    replied
    Both BHR Lawson and LPGuy are correct, you have the authority as a citizen to arrest for breaches of the peace committed in your presence.

    The DOL guide specifies this, but from what Lawson told me, nobody uses that to train, because it tells guards way too much about their authority (as a citizen) and what they "can" do, not what the company doesn't want them to do.

    I once worked a weekend at a site like yours with one gun, 6 bullets, and a flashlight. My partner thought I was crazy. Since we were told that we could not touch anyone, and only call the police... The rest of the equipment was useless since the only crime you could intervene in was the use of deadly force -and we all know you respond to deadly force with the same.

    That lasted a week, we were told we were allowed to use our equipment so I started carrying it again.

    Leave a comment:

  • Lawson
    Senior Member

  • Lawson
    replied
    Just Some Guy,

    I know exactly what video you are talking about. It doesn't tell you the whole truth. In Washington State, Security Officers have a lot more than what most companies will lead you to believe. When I first started in this biz, I too believed it was Felony in presence only... that is not the case.

    There is a Washington State Attorney General's Opinion that specifically denotes that citizens may complete a citizens arrest for not only the felony, but the misdemeanor given that it is a breach of the peace. It also allows for investigative detentions, something a lot states do not have.

    https://fortress.wa.gov/cjtc/www/for...tudy_Guide.pdf

    There is some good info in that PDF to open you up a little bit more to Security in WA and our use of force.

    Leave a comment:


  • LPGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by Just_Some_Guy View Post
    LPGuy, do you have access to the DOL training videos (the ones they taped in the early 90s)? I believe it was from there where I was told I could not arrest except for felonies. Looks like the videos contain obsolete information.
    I've never seen those videos. The document I posted above appears to be an opinion from 1995 on citizen arrest powers as determined by current Washington State case law, since we have "no statute concerning citizen's arrests generally" (as quoted from the document).

    Originally posted by Just_Some_Guy
    I am hoping it was only a one-time thing (school's out, kids are bored, have access to fireworks).
    More than likely. The kids get pretty crazy at the end of the school year, especially when they have access to things that blow up.

    Leave a comment:

  • Just_Some_Guy
    Member

  • Just_Some_Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by LPGuy View Post
    Incorrect. In Washington State, private citizens (to include security officers) may conduct a citizen's arrest for both breach of the peace misdemeanors committed in the citizen's presence and for felonies.
    LPGuy, do you have access to the DOL training videos (the ones they taped in the early 90s)? I believe it was from there where I was told I could not arrest except for felonies. Looks like the videos contain obsolete information.

    Everyone else, yes, this issue will most definitely be taken up with the supervisor - that was a lot of action for my first night on site. My FTO has been here for 5 months said that he has never encountered that amount of violence by such a large group, this was a definite first. I am hoping it was only a one-time thing (school's out, kids are bored, have access to fireworks). I feel sorry for the officer out there tonight that has to deal with all of us. Happy 4th for him.

    Leave a comment:


  • LPGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by Just_Some_Guy View Post
    I am issued 0 equipment besides the Crown Vic. I borrowed another officer's vest for the night, and I carry a large maglite for defense. I am not allowed to carry any weapons yet (certification still in progress), but I can carry everything else.
    Once your certifications are complete, will you be issued your weapons? I wouldn't carry empty cases/pouches/holsters on your duty belt in the meantime. In fact, I wouldn't even work the site until properly equipped, as you're looking at some huge safety issues there; that's something I'd take up with your supervisor. If the site calls for an officer issued with certain types of gear, then you shouldn't be working it until you have that gear. I think you'd have a good negligence lawsuit on your hands if you were hurt while told to work the site without the proper equipment.

    Similiarly, police officers aren't put out on patrol while still working on getting their firearm, Taser, and OC training completed.

    Originally posted by Just_Some_Guy
    State law prohibits us from making arrests unless a felony is committed in our presence,
    Incorrect. In Washington State, private citizens (to include security officers) may conduct a citizen's arrest for both breach of the peace misdemeanors committed in the citizen's presence and for felonies. Refer to this guide from the Washington State Department of Licensing that is written specifically for security officers: http://dol.wa.gov/business/securityg...zenarrest1.pdf.

    I imagine you're going to deal with a whole range of crimes, to include domestics, fights and assaults, home burglaries, car prowls and auto-thefts, noise complaints, loitering, drug dealing, trespassing... good luck and stay safe out there. Get those certifications ASAP!

    Leave a comment:


  • bigdog
    replied
    Originally posted by Just_Some_Guy View Post
    Thanks, I'll try that.



    Our response was to take cover until PD arrived. We were definitely not going to go after them while they're detonating small explosives at us. After the juveniles left the area, we scoured the area with 4 PD units for an hour (several residents called in the attack as well as vandalism on their property, which accounts for the large response). 2 were detained but released as we could not positively ID them, and a third was transported to the local precinct to be picked up by his grandmother, over an hour away. No charges, no case numbers.

    I am issued 0 equipment besides the Crown Vic. I borrowed another officer's vest for the night, and I carry a large maglite for defense. I am not allowed to carry any weapons yet (certification still in progress), but I can carry everything else.



    This is defintely not a observe and report site. We respond to calls from the residents all night (noise complaints, vandalism) and do a full vehicle patrol for the entire shift, clearing out public areas after nightfall and being a visible deterrance (a small amount of gang activity and drug dealing in the area). We ARE supposed to be proactive and make contact with people. Our only real weapon is to threaten an eviction (management typically evicts after 2 or 3 incidents) or arrest by PD (trespassing, if they refuse to leave). State law prohibits us from making arrests unless a felony is committed in our presence, but otherwise it's "use your best judgement", which I intrepret as "unless it's you/a child/a woman being physically attacked, don't even think about it".
    Id consider someone shooting a roman candle at me aggravated assault because it could cause serious bodily injury as could the fire crackers. Also there is an Ag opinion that says in the state of WA a citizen can arrest for misdemeanors in presence.
    hers what the DOl in washington state says about it. http://dol.wa.gov/business/securityg...zenarrest1.pdf

    Leave a comment:

Leaderboard

Collapse
Working...
X