http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...717-story.html
The SAFETY Act lets corporations avoid lawsuits after a terrorist attack provided that they can show they had adequate security in place. The take away for security companies is that if you do event security or protect any other facilities that may be targets, the extra time and effort to get a SAFETY Act certification would be worth it. Reading the between the lines, it sounds like the security company doesn't have a lot to worry about it, but MGM does, hence the preemptive suing to dismiss potential litigants in the case.
The SAFETY Act lets corporations avoid lawsuits after a terrorist attack provided that they can show they had adequate security in place. The take away for security companies is that if you do event security or protect any other facilities that may be targets, the extra time and effort to get a SAFETY Act certification would be worth it. Reading the between the lines, it sounds like the security company doesn't have a lot to worry about it, but MGM does, hence the preemptive suing to dismiss potential litigants in the case.
Comment