Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Google Street View security question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mr. Security
    replied
    This is a tough call. It could be helpful to terrorists because they can reduce the number of times they actually need to be on site to scout their intended target. Remember, law enforcement and security is counting on the way terrorists do meticulous planning/rehearsing as a way to recognize a potential attack.

    On the other hand, GPS signals use to be skewed from public receivers because many feared an attack during the cold war. Today, we count on it for all sorts of things: navigation, location, etc. Nevertheless, I'm leaning towards playing it safe by restricting the information, not only as a protection against terrorists, but also as a way to protect privacy.

    Leave a comment:


  • craig333
    replied
    I checked the building I work at. Its so old it doesnt even have the gas station next to the building on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • JB diligence
    replied
    The idea of the street level shots bug me, I like Google Earth and have used it a few times to point out a specific location on a property. Though some areas are outdated or out of focus, I agree with those here who say it's a good recon tool as it gives a "birds eye view" of their location of interest.

    From a security standpoint a real catch 22... Good for us as far as protecting properties, also good for the Bad Guy's whatever their motive.

    Leave a comment:


  • Curtis Baillie
    replied
    In their July issue Access Controls and Security will be carrying an article on Google Street View.

    Leave a comment:


  • Curtis Baillie
    replied
    Originally posted by HotelSecurity View Post
    I don't think they can see anything from these photos that they couldn't get from taking pictures flying over a target in a plane. Yes, using Google is cheaper than renting a plane but the known terrorists don't seem to be lacking funds.
    Take a look at the "street view" version. It a view of the buildings from ground level.

    Leave a comment:


  • HotelSecurity
    replied
    I don't think they can see anything from these photos that they couldn't get from taking pictures flying over a target in a plane. Yes, using Google is cheaper than renting a plane but the known terrorists don't seem to be lacking funds.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill Warnock
    replied
    Originally posted by Andy Taylor View Post
    Somthing to be aware of, yes. but has been said it is outdated. I supose a quick recon could determine how outdated the photos are. This would be much quicker and safer then doing a full recon to get the info available on the web. A quick check of Google Earth just showed my Father-in-law's motorhome in my driveway. It hasn't been there since 2002.
    Andy, you put your finger on it! The bad guys keep their exposure down to a bare minimum.
    Excellent post. A couple of drives past your home would indicate you live there. If you are the target that is all the intelligence they need.
    Enjoy the day,
    Bill

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy Taylor
    replied
    Somthing to be aware of, yes. but has been said it is outdated. I supose a quick recon could determine how outdated the photos are. This would be much quicker and safer then doing a full recon to get the info available on the web. A quick check of Google Earth just showed my Father-in-law's motorhome in my driveway. It hasn't been there since 2002.

    Leave a comment:


  • craig333
    replied
    If I'm a terrorist I sure wouldnt want to trust outdated information. Layouts do change.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rooney
    replied
    Originally posted by N. A. Corbier View Post
    Personally, I don't really see a problem with this, as the intelligence is so outdated as to be nearly useless.
    Because the information may be a couple years old does not mean it could not be valuable to those bent on harm. I.E. parking garage layout, office building exterior intelegence, etc..

    The cars and paint may have changed but the structure would remain virtually unchanged in most cases.

    The JFK situation is a good example of using "public" information for harm.

    Leave a comment:


  • N. A. Corbier
    replied
    Keep in mind that Keyhole, the company that Google bought for Google Maps and Google Earth, had a version for homeland security called Keyhole for Public Safety.

    Google retains this using Keyhole for Homeland Security, which allows GPS and GIS overlays.

    Personally, I don't really see a problem with this, as the intelligence is so outdated as to be nearly useless.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill Warnock
    replied
    Geoff this is handing those who would do us harm valuable information on a silver platter. New York's JFK International had surveillance done of its tank farms. Why do it on your own when a treasure trove of information is available from the Internet.
    I would hope Google's ardor is dampened when they find out what harm they might perpetuate.
    Curtis your comments are indeed apropos. Good job everyone, home and tea!
    Enjoy the day,
    Bill

    Leave a comment:


  • Contact
    replied
    This is a great example of why it's important to not be complacent in your security measures. Remember, Google only takes new photos every few years, they are not live feeds.

    If you find your building, see how you would break into it, and adjust your measures accordingly. I highly doubt that this will become a true security issue, as viligant guards will see them coming anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rooney
    replied
    I completely agree with your concerns. Although it is legal. Information is key, not only to LE and Security, but also to the ones that want to harm us. Being able to completely check out a perspective target online is another reason that we all need to stay observant of our surroundings. I'm sure there will be alot of backlash about this towards Google and others. Google should have put the training camps in New Jersey, Upstate NY, and other places on there so we can see exactly whats going on with our enemies instead of letting our enemies know us better. Thats my 2 cents.

    Leave a comment:


  • Curtis Baillie
    replied
    Interesting. I was just able to look into the lobby of my old office building at 47th & 7th in NYC. I think this will become an issue. It's been on the news for the past few days in Philadelphia.

    Leave a comment:

Leaderboard

Collapse
Working...
X