Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Airport Security: Gap at the Gate story

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Airport Security: Gap at the Gate story

    In this story, 5 Eyewitness News from Saint Paul, Minnesota shows how a homemade identication card gets through airport security at the Minneapolis St. Paul International airport. I also attached a link to watch the streaming video from www.kstptv5.com.

    5 Eyewitness News: "Gap at the gate: No ID to fly" video


    We break new ground in a 5 Eyewitness News investigation into airport security.

    And we find the gap at the gate is open wider than ever.

    Last May we exposed what some called serious security lapses by using a homemade identification card to board planes at several airports.

    Now we go a step further and by doing so raise questions about the federal no fly list. We show you don't need any ID at all to get on an airplane.

    On a Tuesday Morning at Minneapolis St. Paul International airport reporter John Mason is on a flight to New York City. With his Northwest boarding pass and an identification card we made on a computer he's through the security checkpoint in seconds. No questions asked. No additional screening. He flew to New York to show his ID to a woman who has a profound reason to care about the gaps we found in airport security.

    Debra Burlingame said, "The point is to lull the American people into feeling that something is being done for their security. This is not something. This is a joke."

    Burlingame's brother Chick, who was born in the Twin Cities, was the pilot of the American Airlines jet that terrorists crashed into the Pentagon on 9-11. Burlingame became a critic of security at airports, this year testifying before Congress about fake ID's. Raising the same question our investigation raises: 'Do airlines know who is on their planes?'

    John asked Debra, "Do you think they do? She said, "No, I do not think they know. I know they don't know."

    On his return trip from New York's JFK, he wasn't asked for ID at the Northwest ticket counter, even though he was changing flights. Security at JFK passed him through in seconds, just glancing at his homemade ID.

    So we could fly in and out of the Twin Cities and JFK ... No questions asked. Yet, when he presented his home made ID to get into a meeting of the Metropolitan Airports Commission at the Twin Cities Airport, he was turned away.

    The reason? You need a Government issued I-D to get in. Imagine that.

    It's been drilled into travelers that you need to present a picture ID to fly. There's a sign that says so at the Security Checkpoint.

    But he got in line for a Northwest flight to Chicago with only a boarding pass. No ID at all. The screener never asked why. She passed me along to the TSA where he was wanded and patted down. With that he was through security.

    But here's the twist. The boarding pass he presented wasn't his. Take a look. It was a boarding pass for his co worker, Jim O'Connell. For all Northwest and the TSA knew he could have been anyone. Anyone. Even someone on the government's No Fly List.

    In its final report, The 9-11 Commission called out the importance of checking passenger identification at airport gates. Calling it the 'last opportunity to check whether they're terrorists.'

    In May, aviation expert Kathleen Sweet was blunt when we told her we flew without showing government ID, let alone no ID at all.

    Sweet said, "It defeats the no fly list, it defeats all the other precautions."

    In our months of investigating the 'Gap at the Gate' we've reported that the airport screeners who check your ID are not employees of the TSA. They work for the airlines. In May, Northwest said it would work with Globe Security screeners and quote: ensure that only government issued IDs are accepted."

    Northwest's statement this time was nearly the same: that Globe Security has committed to improve their acceptance of only government issued IDs.

    What happens at the Gate is inconsistent at best. Some say it's dangerous.

    Burlingame says, "I think the American people have to get mad about this. They have to speak up."

    We asked the TSA if someone could compromise the 'No Fly List' by doing what we did. It's statement to us doesn't answer the question. A TSA spokesperson said the 'No Fly List' is one layer of security. The goal, according to the TSA, is to make sure everyone who gets on a plane is screened. Reporter John Mason was screened, but the airline had no idea who he was.
    "To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the highest skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the highest skill." Sun-Tzu

  • #2
    Typical.

    The US never learns from mistakes. Or govt. could learn a thing or two from Israel's Ben Gurion Airport.

    Of course, that wouldn't go over here in America; people wouldn't put up with more obtrusive security.

    Personally, I don't care if I am inconvenienced if my life is at stake.

    Comment


    • #3
      I have to note that TSA seems to be having multiple priorities with their screening system. Lets look at what they're all trying to accomplish, however effectively, by screening passengers:

      - Physical Screening of Passengers and Luggage, hopefully to screen for weapons and dangerous devices. This does not require to know who you are, only what you have on your person.

      - Identity Screening of Passengers, trying to determine who is on the aircraft, how they paid for their ticket, and their appearant threat index. This has nothing to do with "what do they have," and more "who are they?" This is where the domestic no-fly list comes into play.

      - Identity Screening at Ports of Entry, trying to determine if the person is on any no-entry lists, no-fly lists, and other things on inbound flights from foreign countries. This is how ICE and DHS tries to prevent terrorists, people who support terrorism, and high threat index persons from entering the country.

      So, we have at least 2 missions, "What do they have," and "Who are they?" While the "Who are they?" seems to be failing miserably, how badly is "What do they have?" going?

      In the long run, I would think "Who are they?" would be more important than "What do they have?," because it is an intelligence tool. "What do they have?" prevents another hijacking, airplane bomb, etc. "Who are they?" prevents CONUS cells from gaining additional personnel, material, resources, and physical presence in CONUS.

      Then again, with the age of the internet, you don't need to physically meet to be a terrorist cell, full motion video (webcams), confrence VoIP, encrypted SSH tunneling... The same technology that links government offices, industry, commercial enterprise, and distributed training systems would fair well in training/advising/planning terrorist operations. And with the amount of militant websites of various stripes, I'd say they know this, and know it well.
      Some Kind of Commando Leader

      "Every time I see another crazy Florida post, I'm glad I don't work there." ~ Minneapolis Security on Florida Security Law

      Comment


      • #4
        TSA employs many "warm bodies" as well. And even if they had more qualified screeners, who wants to look at a scanner screen all day long? Unless the airlines are as proactive about security as Israel's (I forget the name of their airline) a determined hijacker/terrorist might very well accomplish their sickening mission.

        By the way, don't you love it when grandma & grandpa are having their luggage searched while other, shall we say 'unsavory,' individuals walk right on through?
        Security: Freedom from fear; danger; safe; a feeling of well-being. (Webster's)

        Comment


        • #5
          I had a guy come up to me and say something about the TSA
          He had said, hey lets just get to the point here, they should only be screening middle eastern people, people who look like terrorists.

          Well I told him, well can you tell me what a terrorist looks like?
          not everyone from the middle east is engaged or supports terrorism, its just a select few, but lets not only forget Timothy McVeigh too He was a white male american who even served his country in the US Army and look what he did.

          As far as people who are selected to undergo more screening, the airline is the one who decides that, not TSA, the airline does based on certain circumstances.

          Comment


          • #6
            I think they mean "additional screening" by TSA. I have been selected for additional screening by TSA, way before I got near the airline terminal. Carry a bunch of electronics gear in carry-on, while wearing a pair of steel-toed Rocky Tactical boots. Thankfully, one of the screeners knew what PC Cards were, and PCMCIA cards. The others were trying to pull the PCMCIA cards apart to get at the knives they saw inside. The "knives" were the I/O shield. The other screener was like, "Give them to me, I know what those are."
            Some Kind of Commando Leader

            "Every time I see another crazy Florida post, I'm glad I don't work there." ~ Minneapolis Security on Florida Security Law

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by N. A. Corbier
              I think they mean "additional screening" by TSA.
              Exactly. Thanks for the clarification.
              Security: Freedom from fear; danger; safe; a feeling of well-being. (Webster's)

              Comment


              • #8
                I'm going to go out on somewhat of a tangent regarding airport safety. As a private pilot, my gripe is with the media who continue to 'feed the flames' of panic with the general public about general aviation aircraft being used for terrorist attacks. Granted, there have been some highly publicized cases where pilots who were lost inadvertently flew into restricted airspace. Remember though, that one of those aircraft that emptied the capital was a state governor's.

                I would like to see a law passed that requires active security at ALL airports. Even so, the risk of terrorist using a container ship, truck, or van is far greater than using a small slow-moving aircraft that has a limited payload.

                When an airspace violation does occur, the FAA should be the agency that has the jurisdiction to investigate and, if necessary, make the arrest. Local authorities may have to detain the violator(s), but ultimately the FAA needs to assert its jurisdiction and handle the enforcement issues.

                Just a thought.
                Security: Freedom from fear; danger; safe; a feeling of well-being. (Webster's)

                Comment


                • #9
                  My own local airport, Kenosha Regional, required a senator to lobby DHS for grant money to put up security fencing. Its finally up, 1 year after it was supposed to be. For months, it was lying in bundles around the perimeter of the airport.

                  The airport is a "medium sized" charter, from what I can see. It is not classified as a target. However, a stone's throw away from it (and us) is Zion Nuclear Power Station, a station that's been decomissioned but still has nuclear material.
                  Some Kind of Commando Leader

                  "Every time I see another crazy Florida post, I'm glad I don't work there." ~ Minneapolis Security on Florida Security Law

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by N. A. Corbier
                    My own local airport, Kenosha Regional, required a senator to lobby DHS for grant money to put up security fencing. Its finally up, 1 year after it was supposed to be. For months, it was lying in bundles around the perimeter of the airport.

                    The airport is a "medium sized" charter, from what I can see. It is not classified as a target. However, a stone's throw away from it (and us) is Zion Nuclear Power Station, a station that's been decomissioned but still has nuclear material.
                    There is no shortage of possible targets. That's a fact. The point is that a general aviation aircraft has NEVER been used as a terrorist weapon. The same can't be said for the airliners. If the public wants to worry about the method used to deliver a terrorist attack, they would be better off focusing on the vehicles I've already mentioned.

                    All the hoopla generated by the media every time there is a no-fly-zone- incident just capitalizes on the public's fears and give politicians an opportunity to look good because they get to sound-off about how concerned they are about this "awful, needless threat." Meanwhile, the real threats continue to be overlooked.
                    Security: Freedom from fear; danger; safe; a feeling of well-being. (Webster's)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      After flying to and from Detroit, I realized that I had left a handcuff key on my key chain. TSA didn't say anything about it. Maybe I'm making too much out of it, but I'd think that would be a serious problem.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Serpico
                        After flying to and from Detroit, I realized that I had left a handcuff key on my key chain. TSA didn't say anything about it. Maybe I'm making too much out of it, but I'd think that would be a serious problem.
                        I have to ask, why? Most airlines use flexible or field expdient restraints. FAMs will simply shoot you (heh) if your a deadly threat. They're after possible weapons, mostly.
                        Some Kind of Commando Leader

                        "Every time I see another crazy Florida post, I'm glad I don't work there." ~ Minneapolis Security on Florida Security Law

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by N. A. Corbier
                          I have to ask, why? Most airlines use flexible or field expdient restraints. FAMs will simply shoot you (heh) if your a deadly threat. They're after possible weapons, mostly.
                          I don't know. Just seemed odd, I guess.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Serpico
                            ....I had left a handcuff key on my key chain. TSA didn't say anything about it.
                            Many people wouldn't know what a handcuff key looks like anyway. I wouldn't worry about it the next time.
                            Security: Freedom from fear; danger; safe; a feeling of well-being. (Webster's)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Mr. Security
                              Many people wouldn't know what a handcuff key looks like anyway. I wouldn't worry about it the next time.
                              Many people? If someone doesn't know what a handcuff key looks like, they must of lived a very sheltered life.
                              "To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the highest skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the highest skill." Sun-Tzu

                              Comment

                              Leaderboard

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X