+ Reply to Thread
Results 11 to 20 of 27
-
07-17-2012, 11:53 PM #11
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 207
-
07-18-2012, 12:25 AM #12
Nick Buckles is not the owner of G4S, he is the CEO, however I think that when the dust settles this man will be checking the Job Vacancy Ads.
G4S is a multi-national public company with major security contracts throughout the world.
http://www.g4s.com/
-
07-18-2012, 08:01 AM #13
"Life is hard - it's really hard if you are stupid." - John WayneRetail Security Consultant / Expert Witness
-
07-18-2012, 08:15 AM #14
Right, no one is taking "control" of British airports lol. The FBI will have a presence in country though.
http://espn.go.com/olympics/summer/2...in-london-woes
The FBI is sending about two dozen FBI agents to London to work on Olympic security, according to two U.S. government officials. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the plans.~Black Caesar~
Corbier's Commandos
" "The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." ~Margaret Thatcher
-
07-25-2012, 07:15 AM #15
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 1,090
I just heard that because of the low pay (barely above minimum wage), many G4S security officers are not showing up..lol. Hope that sends a message to G4S
"I am not a hero. I am a silent guardian, a watchful protector"
-
07-27-2012, 04:03 AM #16
What I find the most amazing part of this whole deal is the way the G4S leadership has not taken into account the age old fact of security officers being an extremely unstable workforce with high turnover rates. You can't expect people working with "barely" mimimum wages and exhausting work hours to be the most dependable lot.. especially when the security companies will hire just about anyone with a pair of legs and a head.
I'm hoping that this outcome will send whoever was responsible for the security planning of the games the message that private security companies should not be relied upon on a large-scale level for security for events of this magnitude.Hope that sends a message to G4S
-
07-30-2012, 03:44 AM #17
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
- Helsinki, Finland
- Posts
- 103
I kind of cringed at the stories of G4S recruiting 18 year olds with next to nothing previous work experience. Sure, they might be able to direct traffic and give customer service as well as screening the hordes of Olympic tourists coming in, but that's likely all they'll manage.
Actually last year I heard that G4S was considering recruiting old employees from other countries to work in the Olympics as attaining the SIA licenses in the UK doesn't require British citizenship (or subjectship :P ) but they apparently turned the idea down.
Short on staff and still having to take anyone with functioning legs and hands doesn't really provide for good PR.
-
07-30-2012, 06:08 PM #18
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 207
Directing traffic safely and well actually takes training and experience, I would not want an 18 yo w/o it doing traffic esp not an event like this.
-
07-31-2012, 04:12 PM #19
My views, opinions and statements are my own. They are not of my company, affiliates or coworkers.
-If you try to shoot the messenger, this one shoots back
-It's just a job kid, deal with it
-The industry needs to do one of two things; stop fiddling with the thin line and go forward or go back to that way it was. A flashlight in one hand and your set of keys in the other
-
07-31-2012, 07:28 PM #20







Reply With Quote
