+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 11 1 2 3 ... Last
  1. #1
    Curtis Baillie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,910

    Default WalMart Fires LP

    Walmart fires Layton guards for disarming shoplifter.

    By Roxana Orellana and Melinda Rogers
    The Salt Lake Tribune
    First published Feb 10 2011 05:22PM
    Updated Feb 11, 2011 12:01AM

    The whole incident happened in matter of seconds, Lori Poulsen said. She and the other security employees at the Layton Walmart Supercenter had stopped a man who had unwrapped a laptop and hidden it under his clothes. Trent Allen Longton was taken into an office, where he handed over the merchandise. Read the story.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    104

    Default

    These kind of situations make it even harder for rest of us in retail, it gives the "thief" even more power. If he/she announces they have a gun, there is no way I'm tackling/apprehending him if it's a currently safe situation but obviously one is acting on impulse in that situation. It's just frustrating to have no wiggle room or at least room for discretion. Touch and be touched, is essentially what the laws are now.

    But in that situation if he announces he has a gun without the proper permits as applicable in said regions, he most certainly is in violation of the law and for that I would be hesitant to let him walk out the door. What if he starts shooting? At what point does liability exist? While admitting I am new to this side of Criminal Justice, couldn't one perform a citizens arrest? A non permitted gun in a retail environment has to be justifiable.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Edmonton Alberta
    Posts
    84

    Default Had to jump in

    Upon reading through the forum I came across this article. I did not want to jump in and start posting right away however I just cant believe this article.

    Quote
    Poulsen watched as Longton, 25, reached to the small of his back and pulled out a gun, placed it on the side of his leg and cocked it. Poulsen announced "gun — hand" to let everyone know. Longton moved closer to the office door, where three other employees were standing. They raised their hands at the sight of the gun.
    Security workers Shawn Ray and Justin Richins each grabbed Longton by an arm and spun him around. Poulsen then took the gun away from the man.

    If I was put in that position I would fear I would actually freeze up. Going hands on with a subject that has a firearm is IMO the stupid thing ever. The subject more than likely gave the staff notice saying I just need to leave so why dont you just let him.

    Now I never have been placed in a scenerio like this so I cant say how I would respond to it. However wouldnt just letting him leave be the best method? We arent paid to be super hero's, we are paid to protect assests. My biggest assest IS ME I want to go home at the end of my shift. A laptop aint worth my life.

    Even then when they made that choice to preserve thier lifes how can the store not back them up? I am new to the security industry but shouldnt a company back you up?

  4. #4
    Curtis Baillie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,910

    Default

    OK, let me give posters at least my point of view on this. WalMart LP offices are pretty small. The articles says that there were witnesses standing in front of the door and they raised their hands when the gun was produced.

    First off, it appears there were to many witnesses in the room, they were blocking the exit and froze at the sight of the gun and the announcement made by the thief. And, the thief now is standing behind a Manager with his hand on the Managers shoulder and the gun in his hand.

    Under those circumstances the LP in charge has to make a split second decision. They decided to disarm the suspect. I have been in the same situation and was faced with the same split second decision as the WalMart LP staff. My thought at the time was, I'm coming out of this alive, and would take the same action today - no matter what the company policy was.

    EdmontonLP - You say you would freeze up. You don't know that - you don't know what you would do until faced with the decision.

    Brentjk1 - Forget your Criminal Justice class on this one. The lesson in this case is about survival.

    In my case something the gunman/thief didn't know - I was an ex-police officer and one of Corbier's "Angry Marines."
    Last edited by Curtis Baillie; 02-15-2011 at 01:27 PM.

  5. #5
    Mr. Chaple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    951

    Default

    Longton stood behind assistant manager Gabriel Stewart, holding his shoulder with one hand and the gun inside his pocket with the other.
    A week later, the four employees were fired.
    Is my reading comprehension a little weak today, or did the fire the assistant manager who was taken hostage along with the three LPOs who saved him?
    "A good deed’s like pissing yourself in dark pants. Warm feeling but no one notices." - Jacob Taylor

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Rivet City, Capitol Wasteland
    Posts
    7,369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Curtis Baillie View Post
    OK, let me give posters at least my point of view on this. WalMart LP offices are pretty small. The articles says that there were witnesses standing in front of the door and they raised their hands when the gun was produced.

    First off, it appears there were to many witnesses in the room, they were blocking the exit and froze at the sight of the gun and the announcement made by the thief. And, the thief now is standing behind a Manager with his hand on the Managers shoulder and the gun in his hand.

    Under those circumstances the LP in charge has to make a split second decision. They decided to disarm the suspect. I have been in the same situation and was faced with the same split second decision as the WalMart LP staff. My thought at the time was, I'm coming out of this alive, and would take the same action today - no matter what the company policy was.

    EdmontonLP - You say you would freeze up. You don't know that - you don't know what you would do until faced with the decision.

    Brentjk1 - Forget your Criminal Justice class on this one. The lesson in this case is about survival.

    In my case something the gunman/thief didn't know - I was an ex-police officer and one of Corbier's "Angry Marines."
    Survival trumps being a good worker drone that died in the like of LP duty.

    See also: The only reason he isn't dead is because I didn't have a gun. Once I got his, he didn't have a gun, so I didn't kill him.

    If someone is stupid enough to introduce a gun into something, they should be aware that another person may respond with 5 to 21 rounds to center mass. All it takes is one bystander seeing a guy draw a gun and grab someone's shoulder, and our bad guy and possibly the hostage is dead or dying.
    Some Kind of Commando Leader

    "Every time I see another crazy Florida post, I'm glad I don't work there." ~ Minneapolis Security on Florida Security Law

  7. #7

    Default

    Its a scary situation when a shoplifter pulls a gun and cocks it and lies it on his leg. God was watching these LPO's that day, they did the right thing and disarmed the subject. Doesn't matter what the items are nobody should be pulling a weapon for items if somebodys life is on the line. Everybody would say oh i would do it this way if i was there. Doesn't matter what you say because you weren't in the moment. They did do the right thing, even if they didn't follow policy, they thought about themselves and their families and all the customers and associates that walk outside there doors.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Chaple View Post
    Is my reading comprehension a little weak today, or did the fire the assistant manager who was taken hostage along with the three LPOs who saved him?
    Layton is about an hour north of my house and this has been in the news over the past week.

    You're correct. The manager and 3 LPO's were fired after the incident. Walmart cited their deviation from official company policy for the reason they were fired, stating that their actions further endangered themselves, other employees, and the patrons inside the store at the time.

    I worked as a restaurant manager near downtown Denver, and a franchise store 2 miles away from us was robbed at gunpoint twice. We were given "additional training" after these incidents and the main thing that was preached was "give them what they want, keep the situation stable."

    Although this situation wasn't completely under control, it was somewhat stable. By disarming him they caused a scuffle and suddenly this somewhat stable situation became very volatile. Had the LPO's failed at disarming him it would have thrown the man into a panic and he would respond with his own "fight or flight" instinct. Then you could be dealing with an active shooter.

  9. #9
    Mr. Chaple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    951

    Default

    I was hoping I had just mis-read the article. Although I do not agree with it, I understand their (very slim, and unreasonable) justification for firing the LPOs. But I cannot wrap my head around how the justify firing the AM. To me it sounds no different than firing a cashier for being robbed.
    Last edited by Mr. Chaple; 02-15-2011 at 04:51 PM. Reason: missed typo
    "A good deed’s like pissing yourself in dark pants. Warm feeling but no one notices." - Jacob Taylor

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    1,836

    Default

    I'm just curious, does anybody know if searching an apprehended subject is common practice in the US?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register