IP-Alarms
06-23-2010, 11:57 PM
I'm a big fan of DSC and was raised on their alarm control panels, but they have recently done something that I think falls into a grey area. Many of you may have heard of their latest panel called the Alexor. Bundled with it is a Tl265GS IP/GPRS communicator and it is very popular in the DIY community.
What people do not always realise when they purchase the Tl265GS bundle is that it is completely useless without a subscription to Connect 24. That is understandable for the GPRS side of the communicator as there is a cellular network provider and SIM card involved, but why has the IP side of the communicator been crippled?
Consumers hoping for IP comms now, with the option of adding cellular later, are getting a nasty shock as DSC "forgot" to mention the requirement of Connect 24 in their End User brochure.
Ethical or not?
What people do not always realise when they purchase the Tl265GS bundle is that it is completely useless without a subscription to Connect 24. That is understandable for the GPRS side of the communicator as there is a cellular network provider and SIM card involved, but why has the IP side of the communicator been crippled?
Consumers hoping for IP comms now, with the option of adding cellular later, are getting a nasty shock as DSC "forgot" to mention the requirement of Connect 24 in their End User brochure.
Ethical or not?