nogasectech
07-01-2008, 02:50 PM
I keep finding more and more clients (res & com) with data-based phone service. I have some AHJ's that see and others that will not recognize the potential hazzards.
In these type service providers the phone service is easily interrupted due to power outages or "hik-ups" in the data stream.
I try to get the client to install one CO line just for the Fire/Security systems. They are usually resistant due to the excess cost coupled with the SP insisting they have a UPS on the modem.
Has anyone experienced a "failure to dispatch" event due to SP failures due to power outages or equipment issues?
Last year I was named in a lawsuit because of a building fire that I only had a security system installed. When I contracted with the owner he was no intrested in the Fire system. The AHJ wasn't requiring it, his insurance carrier didn't require it, therefore he didn't purchase it. While meeting with adjusters, the client, the Fire Marshall all said they didn't understand why I was in the meeting much less named in the suit. It cost approximately $10,000.00 to beat the claim or to proove my "innocense". So much for torte reform.
Here in lies the reason I'm concerned about the use of IP type phone service.
Anybody???
In these type service providers the phone service is easily interrupted due to power outages or "hik-ups" in the data stream.
I try to get the client to install one CO line just for the Fire/Security systems. They are usually resistant due to the excess cost coupled with the SP insisting they have a UPS on the modem.
Has anyone experienced a "failure to dispatch" event due to SP failures due to power outages or equipment issues?
Last year I was named in a lawsuit because of a building fire that I only had a security system installed. When I contracted with the owner he was no intrested in the Fire system. The AHJ wasn't requiring it, his insurance carrier didn't require it, therefore he didn't purchase it. While meeting with adjusters, the client, the Fire Marshall all said they didn't understand why I was in the meeting much less named in the suit. It cost approximately $10,000.00 to beat the claim or to proove my "innocense". So much for torte reform.
Here in lies the reason I'm concerned about the use of IP type phone service.
Anybody???